I awoke this morning to various views on Amazon’s acquisition of Goodreads, varying in tone from, “Meh,” to, “OHMYGODIT’STHEENDOFTHEWORLD!”

And everywhere in between.

I tend more toward the “Meh” end of the spectrum myself. Why?

Shelfari. Oh, and a little site you might have heard of called IMDb.

Yeah, I’ll wait while you go over to the IMDb site and scroll all the way down to the bottom to take a look. Go ahead. I’ll still be here.

How many of you even knew Amazon owned IMDb? Show of hands. I, for one, didn’t.

There are other sites they also own that haven’t become Amazon clones. I don’t think Amazon is going to screw non-Kindle owners. Will buy links for other retailers disappear from the site? *shrugs* Who knows. But isn’t the raison d’etre of Goodreads for people to engage with each other about the books they’ve read? If you’re used to buying directly from your device, you can still look those books up on your device and buy them from your retailer of convenience. If you’re like me, with devices of several flavors AND a multi-iPad/iPhone household with various reader apps installed, you might simply buy from a website in whichever format floats your e-boat at the time.

I think, as a few other blogs have touched on, this isn’t a “devour at all costs” kind of acquisition. I think, frankly, it’s a data acquisition. That it’s a convenient *maniacal giggling f*uck you* kind of acquisition in the face of B&N, Kobo (although if they don’t turn off the reviews to Kobo, then no harm, no foul), Bookish, and others is probably just a happy bonus for them. In fact, the Goodreads site itself is actually in a way a competitor to Shelfari. Who knows? They might (this is my speculation only) want to put some of that data to use to help boost Shelfari somewhat.

So don’t buy into hype from either side of the argument. Take a few moments to read a variety of opinions on the subject, and above all, Don’t Panic! 🙂 Just…breathe. I’ve provided you a handy-dandy list of links on the topic for your perusal. (You’re welcome.)

The sky’s not falling, and Amazon doesn’t (always) eat their young.
Tagged on:     

4 thoughts on “The sky’s not falling, and Amazon doesn’t (always) eat their young.

  • March 29, 2013 at 9:37 pm

    Very nice and logical take – good info on some of the provided links

  • March 30, 2013 at 2:30 am

    Thanks…enjoyed the post. I have to agree with you. Amazon does not always equal ‘bad’.

  • March 30, 2013 at 8:06 am

    Yeah, people on Goodreads forums are freaking. I saw at least six people post that they, ‘weren’t going to stick around after the buy-out is complete’.

    Honestly, I don’t understand the uproar. I was going to ask why, but people on goodreads can get downright nasty if you don’t agree with their opinions. LOL

  • March 30, 2013 at 12:49 pm

    I’m a long time IMDb user (I’ve been told that I’m one of the first people to create an account there). I’ve known for a long time that Amazon owns IMDb. The first clue that they were involved were all the links to buy movies and watch video at Amazon (oh they do offer links to other locations too if Amazon doesn’t sell it). If anything, I think IMDb is a better site since they took over. It’s not only easier to navigate but there are many new features that make the experience more interactive. Their admins there were assholes before Amazon. Now they are much friendlier and actually listen to you. I’m not much of a Goodreads user but I can bet that they will spiff up the site and make them more user friendly. Very Good Blog, Tymber

Comments are closed.